The First Information Report (FIR) is a crucial document that is the first step in a criminal investigation. A person who has witnessed a crime may approach the nearest police station and inform them about the occurrence of the crime. However, FIRs can only be registered at the place where the crime occurred.
Due to this limitation, victims experienced significant delays and complications. Particularly, victims of sexual offenses or road accidents suffered more. These challenges prompted reform, introducing Zero FIR as a mechanism to enable quick reporting and response. This article explores the definition of Zero FIR, compares old and new laws, highlights its importance, discusses its associated challenges, and concludes with its implications for the Indian legal system.
What is Zero FIR?
In simple terms, Zero FIR can be filed at any police station, irrespective of where the crime occurred after the FIR is registered as ‘Zero’ and forwarded to the appropriate police station. This FIR aims to facilitate prompt registration and investigation of cognizable offences, ensuring that victims receive timely assistance.
Suppose a victim approaches a police station to report a cognizable offence (offences for which police do not need the warrant to arrest the accused)– such as murder or sexual assault. In that case, the police should register the FIR even though the incident took place outside their jurisdiction. The Zero FIR is registered and forwarded to the appropriate police station for further investigation.
This FIR has been introduced after being influenced by various judicial pronouncements and recommendations from committees aimed at reforming the criminal justice system. The Justice Verma Committee, formed after the Nirbhaya gang rape case, recommended allowing victims to file FIRs at any police station, thereby eliminating jurisdictional barriers that could impede timely justice.
In the case of Lalita Kumari vs. Government of U.P. (2014), the Supreme Court ruled that police must register the FIR upon receiving information about a cognizable offense. This ruling reinforced the need for immediate action in serious cases and laid the groundwork for the Zero FIR mechanism.
Comparison of Old and New Criminal Laws
-
Old Criminal Laws
The introduction of zero FIRs has brought about radical changes in the administration of criminal justice in India, especially regarding the registration of first information reports (FIRs).
Earlier, as per the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) of 1973, police stations which had control over the area where the crime was committed had to record FIRs. This made it difficult for most of the victims who could suffer delays, as they could be turned back if they visited the wrong police station. The FIR was registered under Section 154 of CrPC for cognizable offences (offences for which police required no warrant to arrest an accused).
-
New Criminal Laws
However, with zero FIR, any police station can record a complaint of any cognizable crime without restrictions on where the crime occurred. This provision ensures that there is an immediate, hassle-free response in cases of serious crimes such as child kidnapping and rape.
The zero FIR Law was correctly and practically introduced and bulldozed through by historic cases like Lalita Kumari v. Government of U.P. (2014), which provided that as soon as any credible information concerning a cognizable crime is available, it is apprehended that applicable laws in that jurisdiction shall include that location and an FIR shall be lodged even outside any jurisdictional policy.
The New Laws define the content of this policy even more, noting the importance of ensuring the protection of the victim and the quick administration of justice while omitting limitational issues that have been an impediment to the administration of justice, especially brought in the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) of July 1, 2023. Section 173 of the BNSS provides for registration of Zero FIR.
Importance of Zero FIR
Since this particular concept has been given a proper place in the Criminal justice system, the following advantages can be attributed:
- Zero FIR rest assured that the concerned authority is on the case immediately, thus aiding in the investigation process since victims can lodge complaints after that.
- Victims can access and deploy the services of any police station to avoid jurisdictional boundaries and soon common and case abolition procedures.
- Submission of complaints soon after the offence has been committed reduces the chances of losing or tampering with evidence, which is vital for serious crimes like homicide or sexual offences.
- The legal system allows victims to seek justice just and reasonably without suffering administrative inconveniences and delays associated with boundaries and jurisdictional limitations.
- The short time required to register and transfer cases, including the Zero FIR, enables better chances of suspect identification and effective management of cases.
Challenges Associated with Zero FIR
Even though Zero FIR has been codified, it still has challenges in implementation, which are mentioned hereunder:
- Lack of awareness: Many potential complainants remain unaware of their right to register a Zero FIR, so this option remains underutilized. Therefore, public awareness campaigns that educate the citizens of their entitlement are paramount.
- Police resistance: There are instances where officers in law enforcement appear to resist the registration of zero FIRs due to bureaucratic processes that are difficult to understand or in situations where there is no clear guideline on transferring cases across jurisdictions.
- Possible abuse: There are fears that zero FIRs may be misused to generate frivolous cases or false reports, which would also burden law enforcement authorities.
- Coordination problems: Slow or miscommunication about passing information between the police stations can delay the investigations.
- Legal Ambiguities: There may be uncertainties regarding how certain cases should be classified or handled under Zero FIR provisions, leading to inconsistencies in application across different jurisdictions.
- Bureaucratic Delays: Even after filing a Zero FIR, if not appropriately managed during transfer processes between jurisdictions, it may still lead to delays that could affect case outcomes.
The introduction of the Zero FIR concept has resolved the age-old issue of curbing jurisdictional limits. It helps deliver justice to victims quicker, thus creating a major advancement in the country’s justice system. Important victim-centric decisions and recommendations that help promote processes under the law have been developed in the legal framework of Zero FIR. The law of the land offers great potential for India in terms of commitment to justice, swift justice for victims, and more protection of victims if only there is public education and reduction of unnecessary paperwork within the legal system. However, there is a need to ensure that this system works effectively for the enforcement bodies at all levels. Last but not least, Zero FIR is a step up in that it seeks to ensure that all members of society can access justice, no matter where they are located concerning the crime. It is also a modern’ approach to policing.
